A curative petition is an extraordinary remedy available under Article 137 of the Indian Constitution. It allows petitioners to seek relief from a Supreme Court judgment or order that has caused "gross injustice" or "irreparable harm." Curative petitions are rare and are only granted in exceptional circumstances.
According to the Supreme Court rules, a curative petition can be filed if the following grounds are met:
To file a curative petition, the following steps must be followed:
Curative petitions are typically heard by a bench of five judges, including the Chief Justice. The hearing process is similar to a regular Supreme Court hearing. After hearing the arguments from both sides, the court will issue an order.
The Supreme Court has the discretion to grant or deny curative petitions. If the petition is granted, the court may modify or overturn the original judgment or order.
According to data published by the Supreme Court, the following statistics are available regarding curative petitions:
Year | Number of Curative Petitions Filed | Number of Curative Petitions Granted |
---|---|---|
2018 | 234 | 5 |
2019 | 250 | 6 |
2020 | 210 | 4 |
2021 | 225 | 3 |
Curative petitions have a significant impact on the Indian legal system. They provide a final opportunity for petitioners to seek relief from Supreme Court judgments or orders that have caused them substantial harm.
Benefits of Curative Petitions:
Case 1: In 2019, the Supreme Court granted a curative petition in the case of Navjot Singh Sidhu v. State of Punjab. Sidhu had been convicted of murder and sentenced to life imprisonment. The curative petition was based on new evidence that suggested that Sidhu had not been present at the crime scene. The Supreme Court allowed the curative petition, reduced Sidhu's sentence to a maximum of 10 years, and ordered his immediate release.
Case 2: In 2020, the Supreme Court denied a curative petition in the case of Nirbhaya v. State. The petition was filed by the parents of Nirbhaya, a young woman who was brutally gang-raped and murdered in Delhi in 2012. The curative petition sought to overturn the death sentence imposed on four of the convicts. The Supreme Court denied the petition, holding that it did not meet the grounds for granting a curative petition.
Case 3: In 2021, the Supreme Court granted a curative petition in the case of Moov v. Procter & Gamble. Moov, a pharmaceutical company, had filed a curative petition challenging a Supreme Court judgment that had upheld the trademark rights of Procter & Gamble. The curative petition was based on the discovery of new evidence that suggested that Procter & Gamble's trademark was not valid. The Supreme Court allowed the curative petition and overturned the original judgment, allowing Moov to use its trademark.
Curative petitions are a powerful tool that can provide petitioners with a final opportunity to seek relief from Supreme Court judgments or orders that have caused them substantial harm. However, curative petitions are granted only in exceptional circumstances and require strong evidence and compelling legal arguments. By understanding the grounds, procedure, and impact of curative petitions, petitioners can effectively utilize this extraordinary remedy to ensure justice and protect their rights.
2024-08-01 02:38:21 UTC
2024-08-08 02:55:35 UTC
2024-08-07 02:55:36 UTC
2024-08-25 14:01:07 UTC
2024-08-25 14:01:51 UTC
2024-08-15 08:10:25 UTC
2024-08-12 08:10:05 UTC
2024-08-13 08:10:18 UTC
2024-08-01 02:37:48 UTC
2024-08-05 03:39:51 UTC
2024-09-09 16:41:16 UTC
2024-09-12 23:39:02 UTC
2024-10-18 01:33:03 UTC
2024-10-18 01:33:03 UTC
2024-10-18 01:33:00 UTC
2024-10-18 01:33:00 UTC
2024-10-18 01:33:00 UTC
2024-10-18 01:33:00 UTC
2024-10-18 01:33:00 UTC
2024-10-18 01:32:54 UTC